<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Professor Says: Have More Sex!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wongkeenhing.com/2007/11/14/the-professor-says-have-more-sex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wongkeenhing.com/2007/11/14/the-professor-says-have-more-sex/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Justin Wong</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Wong</title>
		<link>http://www.wongkeenhing.com/2007/11/14/the-professor-says-have-more-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-22136</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wongkeenhing.com/2007/11/14/the-professor-says-have-more-sex/#comment-22136</guid>
		<description>That stapled condom picture is based off something that really happened. Yup.

Its a psychological matter, yes, now that we&#039;re considering what people want and how they handle their wants. So its all difficult to understand, let alone control. 

Your take on marriage is interesting. Its created by humans, isnt it? But all cultures all across time, you will most likely find a form of marriage. Its the one tradition or cultural norm that doesnt die. 

Well said, Fira!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That stapled condom picture is based off something that really happened. Yup.</p>
<p>Its a psychological matter, yes, now that we&#8217;re considering what people want and how they handle their wants. So its all difficult to understand, let alone control. </p>
<p>Your take on marriage is interesting. Its created by humans, isnt it? But all cultures all across time, you will most likely find a form of marriage. Its the one tradition or cultural norm that doesnt die. </p>
<p>Well said, Fira!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fira</title>
		<link>http://www.wongkeenhing.com/2007/11/14/the-professor-says-have-more-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-22116</link>
		<dc:creator>Fira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wongkeenhing.com/2007/11/14/the-professor-says-have-more-sex/#comment-22116</guid>
		<description>The stapled condom bit is funny. I wonder if anyone was stupid enough to do that. 

I think what the author meant would be the uninfected would have more choice, like for example, Joan could go with clean non-STD-infected Martin instead of the infected Maxwell. But then if people like Martin were to be infected, he would probably from the act of his careful-conscience would refrain from spreading the disease even more before he dies from it than someone like Maxwell who is promiscuous and doesnt give a damn about anyone. But then, you know...in a way, the writer said that of course Martin will do whats best for Martin instead of whats best for the community. But then Maxwell is doing whats best for Maxwell as well, so you really cant blame him you know. Eh, I forgot my point. I just wish if people want to engage in sex they should just get protection as well. Or at least just stick to one partner when they get infected with anything. 

First off, I don&#039;t think god really would care if we had sex before marriage. Marriage itself didn&#039;t even exist in the time of Adam and Eve (i think, it couldnt possibly have existed!) so like hmm. Its just one of those things society created to encourage fixed partnerships. Even if god doesn&#039;t care about pre-marital sex, I still probably will hold up on my principles of saving myself la. It all comes down to the matter of your own principles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stapled condom bit is funny. I wonder if anyone was stupid enough to do that. </p>
<p>I think what the author meant would be the uninfected would have more choice, like for example, Joan could go with clean non-STD-infected Martin instead of the infected Maxwell. But then if people like Martin were to be infected, he would probably from the act of his careful-conscience would refrain from spreading the disease even more before he dies from it than someone like Maxwell who is promiscuous and doesnt give a damn about anyone. But then, you know&#8230;in a way, the writer said that of course Martin will do whats best for Martin instead of whats best for the community. But then Maxwell is doing whats best for Maxwell as well, so you really cant blame him you know. Eh, I forgot my point. I just wish if people want to engage in sex they should just get protection as well. Or at least just stick to one partner when they get infected with anything. </p>
<p>First off, I don&#8217;t think god really would care if we had sex before marriage. Marriage itself didn&#8217;t even exist in the time of Adam and Eve (i think, it couldnt possibly have existed!) so like hmm. Its just one of those things society created to encourage fixed partnerships. Even if god doesn&#8217;t care about pre-marital sex, I still probably will hold up on my principles of saving myself la. It all comes down to the matter of your own principles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Wong</title>
		<link>http://www.wongkeenhing.com/2007/11/14/the-professor-says-have-more-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-21636</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Wong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wongkeenhing.com/2007/11/14/the-professor-says-have-more-sex/#comment-21636</guid>
		<description>Yeah, thats the &#039;conventional&#039; logic to the matter. But the thing is its not easy to prevent people from having unprotected sex, but you can bring in more players in the equation, as the author suggests. And that way, the infected would  have less choice, through &#039;unconventional&#039; logic. Read the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, thats the &#8216;conventional&#8217; logic to the matter. But the thing is its not easy to prevent people from having unprotected sex, but you can bring in more players in the equation, as the author suggests. And that way, the infected would  have less choice, through &#8216;unconventional&#8217; logic. Read the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nicktay</title>
		<link>http://www.wongkeenhing.com/2007/11/14/the-professor-says-have-more-sex/comment-page-1/#comment-21598</link>
		<dc:creator>nicktay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wongkeenhing.com/2007/11/14/the-professor-says-have-more-sex/#comment-21598</guid>
		<description>I have a better theory. If less people have unprotected random casual sex, the decease will eventually only stay with those who do. Those who get HIV, if a cure is not found, would eventually die and the decease with it. I do hope they find a cure though, especially for those who were infected by unfaithful partners, and the poor aids babies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a better theory. If less people have unprotected random casual sex, the decease will eventually only stay with those who do. Those who get HIV, if a cure is not found, would eventually die and the decease with it. I do hope they find a cure though, especially for those who were infected by unfaithful partners, and the poor aids babies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

